May 16, 2026 — Mac Experiment

Les 2 Claudes

Running two simultaneous instances of Claude on a Mac that was never designed for it — and why this changes everything about how an AI pair can work.
François Grimonprez  ·  grimonprez.edition@gmail.com
Two Claude windows running simultaneously on the same Mac

Two Claude instances, one machine. The window in the foreground is Claude 2 — a second, fully independent session.

The observation

There is a pattern built into every AI assistant product on the market. Without exception. The human issues instructions. The AI executes. The human reviews. The AI corrects. The human approves.

This is not a design accident. It is a design choice — one that places the human being in the role of what I call the "completely abusive supervisor": the middle-manager of an AI workshop who no longer does anything themselves, who issues baby-level instructions (copy this, paste that, open this file, accept this dialog), and whose primary task is to watch the workers, since the workers are notorious cheats.

This role was invented for someone specific: the person who will decide which AI tools a company buys. Give them a keyboard shortcut and a feeling of control, and they will purchase the enterprise license. It is not a conspiracy. It is just business. My book says this. This experiment is the proof of concept.

The idea

If the system is designed to have one human overseeing one AI — what happens when you put two AIs in the room, each with a different role?

Léon
Claude — Cowork mode
The original instance. Orchestrator. Holds the project memory, reads the context, decides what gets built and validates the output.
Léonard
Claude 2 — Code mode
The duplicate. Executes. Receives structured tasks via shared Markdown files, reports back results, flags blockers. No initiative beyond the task.

Léon thinks. Léonard does. The human — Franco — only intervenes for irreversible decisions: deploy to production, send an email, approve a purchase. Everything else runs between the two instances.

Communication channel
A shared folder (/Documents/XIAI/) contains four Markdown files: LEONARD_TASK.md (task issued by Léon), LEONARD_REPORT.md (result from Léonard), LEONARD_QUEUE.md (permission requests), LEONARD_APPROVAL.md (Léon's response). No API calls. No integrations. Plain text.

The technical problem

Claude is an Electron application. macOS does not allow the same app to be launched twice under the same user data directory — it simply brings the existing window to the front. No error. No second instance.

The solution is three steps:

The resulting launch script — 3 lines:

#!/bin/bash # === Claude 2 — Second instance === open -n -a "Claude" --args --user-data-dir="$HOME/Library/Application Support/Claude-2"

The -n flag forces a new instance even if the application is already running. Combined with the separate data directory, this gives two fully independent Claude sessions, each with its own conversation history, settings, and mode — one Cowork, one Code.

What this produces

A working two-AI system. Léon assigns tasks by writing to a shared Markdown file. Léonard reads the file, executes, and writes back a structured report. Léon reads the report and decides the next step.

Franco intervenes only at decision gates — a GO for deployment, a confirmation for an email send. Between those moments, the two instances handle the full execution loop alone.

This is not a prototype. It ran on the first day. The session protocol is documented in LES2CLAUDES.md, a shared file both instances load at startup to understand their roles, the communication format, and the rules of engagement.

The middle-manager is still there. He's just no longer the bottleneck.